The members of the Hong Kong Study Circle have built and expanded upon the previous research of Col. Webb and the monographs of Harvey Tilles.
An extraordinary website with a wealth of information exists at http://rodsell.com/hksmsic/hksmsic for security markings and http://rodsell.com/hkperfins/hkperfin.html for perfins. This data has all been gathered by Mr. Rod Sell and members of the Hong Kong Study Circle.
The information below refers solely to those security markings and perfins associated with the China overprints. No markings have been reported from Chefoo.
Perfins
Pefins on the CHINA overprints are rare and, like many of the cancellations used at the time, have not been extensively studied with respect to the overprints (although there has been much study of security markings used on the unoverprinted Hong Kong stamps.) Consequently it is difficult to know if recorded perfin varieties have actually been seen on the overprinted stamps. For instance, H&S/BC perfin is noted as being used in Shanghai, Amoy, Canton, Foochow and Swatow but I believe that this perfin was not used on China overprints as the only recorderd dates appear to be prior to the introduction of the overprinted stamps.
Interestingly, the use of perfins in other places was primarily to prevent employee theft of postage. In China, the use of security chops, markings and perfins was also due to the lack of security of the mailboxes themselves. In fact, the Hong Kong Post Office stated “Boxholders are at liberty to mark their postage stamps on the back or face or by perforation so as to prevent them from being stolen”. The use of perfins on the CHINA overprints has been recorded from the following locations and with the following markings (Harvey Tilles numbering used for convenience)
Number |
Port |
Marking |
Company |
Note |
B-2 |
B.A.T./CoLd |
British American Tobacco |
Only one reported |
|
B-2a |
Shanghai |
D.A.T. |
British American Tobacco |
Speculation by Sell that this is damaged B.A.T. /CoLtd |
B-8 |
BM/&Co |
Behn Meyer & Co |
||
B-13 |
Shanghai |
BW/&CO |
Burroughs Welcome & Co |
LKU 1918 |
D-2 |
Foochow |
D.O.C. |
Det Oversishe Compagnes |
|
H-5 |
Amoy |
HS/BC |
Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank |
Crossbar of “B” slopes downward |
H-6 |
Shanghai |
H S/B C |
Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank |
|
H-9 |
Canton |
H.S/B.C |
Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank |
Reported on Eii Index B |
H-9 |
Shanghai |
H.S/B.C |
Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank |
Unlisted from Shanghai |
H-9 |
Swatow |
H.S/B.C |
Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank |
|
R-2 |
Shanghai |
R & C (o) |
Russell & Co |
Previously Unlisted on ‘China’ overprint |
T-3 |
TC/&S. |
Thomas Cook & Sons |
||
H-9 6mm high, Pins 11+1+11/13+1+8 = 45
H-6 11mm wide, 6mm high, Pins 43
As the stamps were perforated privately, in many cases the quality control was not a rigorous as that of the governmental printing agencies. Consequently, many perforating pins would be bent or missing and this makes accurate identification difficult in some cases.
Number |
Port |
Denomination |
Image
|
B2 | Shanghai | Cover 23 Jun 1919 2c, 4 x 6c |
|
B2a | Shanghai | Cover 23 Oct 1918 2c, 10c and 50c |
|
B2a | Shanghai | Cover 11 May 1918 10c |
|
B2a | Shanghai | Cover 7 Oct 1918 6c and 10c |
|
B2a | Shanghai | Cover 14 Sep 1918 10c | |
B2a | Shanghai | Cover 26 May 1919 2c, 4 x 6c |
|
B2a | Shanghai | Cover Apr 11 1921 4c, 6c | Apr 11 1921 |
B2a | Unknown | 1c Sideways | |
B2a | Shanghai | 6c Sideways | |
B2a | Shanghai | 10c Sideways | |
B2a | Shanghai | 30c Sideways | |
B2a | Shanghai | $1 Sideways | |
B13 | Shanghai | 10c Ultra Inverted and Normal |
|
H5 | Amoy | Cover 25 Sep 1920 4c Inverse |
|
H-9 | Canton | Cover 28 May 1919 4c Sideways 6c Sideways 10c Sideways |
|
R-2 |
Shanghai |
10c |
|
Even more rare than the perfins is the use of handstamps.
Handstamps and Company Markings
Number |
Port |
Company
|
Denomination |
Notes |
Image
|
6m | Swatow | Bradley & Co. | 1st issue 4c | Not previously reported on 4c | |
An apprently unlisted marking "P. Heath & Co/Shanghai" has just been reported stamped on the backflap of a cover from Shanghai to Canada dated Aug 7, 1919. Not much is known at present about this handstamp.
Finally there is an overprint on another 4c red containing a part stamping “…signees”, possibly the word “Consignees” but unknown as to use or meaning at this time. Update Sep 18, 2017 - solved - A consignee letter was simply a letter containing shipping documents. It was sent with the cargo on the ship on which it travelled, and the recipient of the cargo also was the recipient of the letter. Consignee letters normally were given to the ship’s master immediately before departure. To show to the postal authorities that such mail, being delivered without going through the postal system, was not to deceive or avoid payment of stamp postage fees, some of these consignee letters would have the correct postage stamp amount be adhered to the cover and for such stamps to be then franked by the sender with the firm’s security marking as an indication that the postal requirements were being complied with.